Evans, M.A., Williamson, K., and Pursoo, T. (2008).
Preschoolers' attention to print during shared
book reading. Scientific Studies of Reading 12(1),
106-129.
Percentage of time looking at print was 2% in the no
pointing condition, however, attention increased with age. In the pointing
condition, children looked at print more frequently. When controlling for
receptive vocabulary, visual memory, and maturation, emergent orthography and letter-word
identification predicted time looking at print and recognition of concepts
about print.
Literature highlights: Benefits of shared storybook reading as noted in the
literature: enhancement of cognitive and emotional development, interest in
books, factual information about the world, enjoyment, oral and written
language skills and success in reading. Meta analyses by Scarborough and
Dobrich (1994) and Bus, van IJzendoorn, and Pellegrini (1995) support positive
outcomes on language and literacy development. However, Senechal, LeFevre, Thomas, and Daley (1998) found that
oral language and vocabulary were enhanced by story reading, but they had no
effect on acquiring reading skills except where directly taught (parent report
of actual letter and word teaching.) Evans, Shaw and Bell (2000) found that the
frequency of parent activities linked to teaching letter names, sounds and
printing activities predicted knowledge of letter names, letter sounds, and
phonological awareness while vocabulary development was related to frequency of
shared book reading. Thus, vocabulary growth is a likely outcome but not the
development of written language skills. Other studies used eye-tracking to
determine the actual time spent looking at print in storybooks while being read
to. Children infrequently fixated on the print spending less than 6% of their
time looking at the words or 5 seconds out of 2 minutes worth of reading, regardless
of the print features, color, and embedding in pictures. (Evans, Saint-Aubin, 2005;
Justice, Skibbe, Canning, and Lankford, 2005). In fact, children rarely also comment
on print but reserve questions and comments for pictures, story meaning, and
word meaning (Shapiro, Anderson, and Anderson, 1997; van Kleeck, 2003; Yaden,
Smolkin, and Conlon, 1993). Important note about studies: small sample sizes.
Goals of this study: examine age changes, individual differences,
and effect of adult pointing to the words on attention to print in children aged
3-5 yrs during shared reading. This study altered selected print for visual
salience. The methods of estimating attention were calculating the percentage
of time children spent looking at the print during the entire reading of two
books. Also gave children a recognition task to pick out cards that portrayed
the altered print and aspects of the illustrations within the stories in order
to determine relative attention to elements of the print and illustrations.
Study details
89 children initially in the study but final sample was 76
(equal boy/girl groups) ages 36-73 months at initial testing. Parental questionnaires
indicated mostly middle to upper middle
class homes and less than 1/5 low income. 13% mothers & 18% fathers reported
post-secondary education.
172 minutes average time per week reading to children. No
significant differences between age groups in point to text or time spent
reading to children.
Testing materials:
Woodcock-Johnson III Achievement
Measure of emergent orthography knowledge (Levy, Gong, Hessels,
Evans, and Jared, 2006) assessed knowledge of print and spelling conventions.
(paired matches with multiplicity of letters, spacing of letters, scribbles
versus letters, letter like forms vs letters, and pictures vs letters with response
to question: "Which one would your mommy or teacher be able to read?"
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III
Visual memory skills assessed with visual recognition
subtest of british Ability Scales (1983).
Home literacy
Experiences Questionnaire (Evans, Levy, and Jared, 2001).
Results and Conclusions:
In non-pointing groups: Percentage of print-looking time
predicted 16% of variance in print target recognition when the following were
controlled: vocabulary, visual memory, emergent orthography,
word-identification and maturation. No relationship between print-looking time
and illustration cards. Even without the
sophisticated eye-tracker, results were replicated for those two studies
mentioned above. Young children spent
very little time (6 sec) on avg looking at print in a 2.5 minute reading however, there was
slightly more attention to print among the oldest children. Children's emergent
orthography and letter-word identification knowledge predicted variance in the
amount of time looking at print, indicating their interest may have been due to
emergent literacy skills.
Aspects of print that increased accuracy: icon/stylized
elements associated with the print - arrow with detour printed on it. No increased attention to print in speech
bubbles in illustrations. Unique tone of voice encouraged attention - children
spontaneiously pointing to and imitating sounds from memory when they saw the stylized
print, e.g., Whoo whoo! Written in bubblelike letters (logographic response).
Effect of pointing: children in all age groups spent
significantly greater percentage of time looking at print than the control but
it didn't improve the performance of the 3 yr olds in print recognition,
suggesting that children with preliminary concepts about the shape of printed
words may be more affected by finger-pointing. Cautious enthusiasm is the
author's conclusion rather than this being a method of enhancing attention to print
in trade books.
Storybook reading generally is a listening activity while
looking at pictures than a time to learn about print. Children don't develop
print skills merely from listening to books being read. However, some types of
books lend themselves to discussion of print, such as alphabet books. Also,
some parent behaviors help children focus on print during storybook reading,
namely, finger pointing words while reading. this study did not address the
benefits of children attending to print, just noted an increased amount of time
looking at the word pages rather than the picture pages. The author suggests
that it may be a preliminary way of helping children relate sounds to print if
they can already identify letters and have some knowledge of phonemes, citing
Ehri and Sweet, 1991; Uhry, 1999). On
the other hand, adult mediated printing and writing activities substantially
enhance print knowledge in young children (Aram and Levin, 2004).
No comments:
Post a Comment